Bill Would End Wisconsin’s 80-Year-Old prohibition on Cemeteries Owning Funeral Homes
When Kevin Pagenkopf’s son told his first-grade teacher what he wants to be when he grows up, she didn’t expect him to say funeral director.
Pagenkopf said he hopes his 7-year-old son will be able to take over the family’s 101-year-old Oconomowoc funeral home, but the business’ future could be in jeopardy if the state changes its laws to allow competition from cemeteries.
Wisconsin is one of nine states that prohibit cemeteries from owning funeral homes. A bill under consideration in the Legislature would scrap that decades-old law and allow cemeteries and funeral homes to be operated together. Those working against the bill say it’s a bad idea because it would open the way for some big players to move into the state and drive down costs, only to hike them later. But supporters argue deregulating the funeral industry would let an open market determine fair prices.
State and national funeral home associations representing more than 400 directors in Wisconsin oppose the bill, far outnumbering supporters. There are only a small handful of commercial cemeteries in Wisconsin.
“There’s not that many family owned funeral homes (anymore), when 100 years ago, that’s pretty much all you had,” Pagenkopf said. He added, “The track record with these companies that come in, sure they’re cheaper to begin with, but as soon as we fail and go out of business or sell out, that’s when their prices go back up.”
The state’s laws currently prohibit cemetery owners from operating a funeral home on the same property. Wisconsin funeral home owners also can’t own cemeteries elsewhere in the state, and there can be no commercial relationship between cemeteries and funeral homes.
Ending the prohibition would allow companies to provide in-house services or point families to companies that could provide them. It’s a concept cemetery owners say there’s nothing wrong with.
“It doesn’t make any sense for the consumer or for me as the cemetery operator not to have any commercial relationship with a funeral operator,” said Peter Pakalski, who owns 14 cemeteries in Wisconsin.
Pakalski owns 16 more cemeteries outside the state. He and his wife have given the bill’s sponsor, Rep. Joel Kleefisch, R-Oconomowoc, $1,550 since 2006, according to campaign finance records.
“It’s an old, archaic statute that needs to be changed,” Pakalski said. “I want to buy some funeral homes, and the state says I can’t and it’s not right.”
The major stakeholder in the debate is Service Corporation International, the country’s largest cemetery and funeral services organization.
SCI owns 13 funeral homes and five cemeteries in Wisconsin after acquiring the second-largest group, Stewart Enterprises, in December. The merger also puts SCI out of compliance with state law.
“The prohibition doesn’t allow for free market competition,” said Vern Pixley, senior managing director of operations with SCI.
SCI has some time, though Pixley wasn’t sure how much, before it must sell either funeral homes or cemeteries, or possibly face $200-per-day fines for each violation. Cemeteries aren’t subject to property taxes, so Pixley said the company plans to sell off its funeral homes. He said the group works closely with regulators to ensure it remains a “good corporate citizen.”
Opponents also point to SCI as a big factor in the proposed legislation. The merger means SCI will own Wisconsin Memorial Park, a Brookfield cemetery that built a building some say would operate as a funeral home if the law is changed.