Are You Seeing Less Clients Who Have Life Insurance?
Article from: Bankrate.com
Why don’t Americans buy life insurance? At least part of the answer is that we’re not absolutely convinced that the money we tuck away all those years will actually pass to our heirs once we’re gone.
According to the Life Insurance and Market Research Association, or LIMRA, 56 percent of U.S. households did not have an individual policy as of 2010, a 50-year high. Nearly a third of us (30 percent) lacked any coverage at all, even through an employer’s group plan – and that number has grown 22 percent in six years.
Granted, life insurance isn’t likely to compete with food, shelter or even homeowners and auto insurance on most people’s priority lists these days. Even so, in a 2011 telephone survey by the accounting firm Deloitte, 1 in 4 respondents admitted they don’t trust life insurance companies or life insurance agents.
“Either way, the industry has some serious trust issues to address with a significant percentage of consumers,” Deloitte concluded.
Last week, the ongoing multistate, multiagency investigation into life insurers behaving badly surfaced in the news once again when Florida and several other states reached a $40 million settlement with MetLife over alleged improprieties in tracking down the beneficiaries of deceased policyholders. The settlement could result in more than $400 million in death benefits from industrial life policies sold between 1900 and 1964 being paid to the rightful beneficiaries or, failing that, to the appropriate state’s unclaimed property fund.
“MetLife had apparently been using the Social Security Administration’s Death Master File to check to see if a policyholder has died only in cases where such a death would be beneficial to the insurance company. For example, MetLife allegedly used this Master File to stop annuity payments to deceased clients, but did not use it to issue life insurance payments to beneficiaries of the insured,” according to a Miami Herald report.
While the settlement allows MetLife to deny any wrongdoing or liability, it does require the insurer to reform its business practices and step up attempts to find beneficiaries within 120 days of a policyholder’s demise. If no beneficiary is found within a year, MetLife agrees to pay the death benefit or annuity payment to the appropriate state.
The $40 million MetLife settlement will go entirely to cover legal costs, including those of the task force launched in early 2011 by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners.
MetLife joins John Hancock Life and Prudential, which previously reached similar settlements with the investigating jurisdictions.
And so it goes, another life insurance giant deftly flicks an unseemly speck from its immaculate lapel. We did no wrong. We don’t owe anyone. Oh yeah, and of course we’ll try to do better.
I can’t imagine why consumers don’t trust them.
Latest posts by CDFuneralNews (see all)
- WHY DO WE GIVE ALL OUR CONTENT AWAY FOR FREE? | DISRUPT60 007 - July 18, 2018
- ASD’s Spanish Translation Services and Web Form Watch Dog™ Features Selected As Finalists for 2018 NFDA Members’ Choice Award - July 18, 2018
- WISCONSON VERDICT HAS HHUUGGEE IMPLICATIONS ON THE FUNERAL PROFESSION | FUNERAL nation 117 - July 16, 2018
You may be interested
WHY DO WE GIVE ALL OUR CONTENT AWAY FOR FREE? | DISRUPT60 007CDFuneralNews - July 18, 2018
This question gets asked on the daily, "Why do you give so much away for free?". It's a pretty simple…
ASD’s Spanish Translation Services and Web Form Watch Dog™ Features Selected As Finalists for 2018 NFDA Members’ Choice AwardCDFuneralNews - July 18, 2018
Media, PA—ASD–Answering Service for Directors is pleased to announce two of the company’s features have been recognized as finalists for…
WISCONSON VERDICT HAS HHUUGGEE IMPLICATIONS ON THE FUNERAL PROFESSION | FUNERAL nation 117CDFuneralNews - July 16, 2018
The divide continues in the land of cheese. Wisconsin Supreme Court delivered the final verdict saying Funeral Homes and cemeteries…